The Mind As a Scientific Object

Between Brain and Culture

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Psychology, Cognitive Psychology
Cover of the book The Mind As a Scientific Object by , Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9780190286088
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: January 13, 2005
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9780190286088
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: January 13, 2005
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

What holds together the various fields that are supposed to consititute the general intellectual discipline that people now call cognitive science? In this book, Erneling and Johnson identify two problems with defining this discipline. First, some theorists identify the common subject matter as the mind, but scientists and philosophers have not been able to agree on any single, satisfactory answer to the question of what the mind is. Second, those who speculate about the general characteristics that belong to cognitive science tend to assume that all the particular fields falling under the rubric--psychology, linguistics, biology, and son on--are of roughly equal value in their ability to shed light on the nature of mind. This book argues that all the cognitive science disciplines are not equally able to provide answers to ontological questions about the mind, but rather that only neurophysiology and cultural psychology are suited to answer these questions. However, since the cultural account of mind has long been ignored in favor of the neurophysiological account, Erneling and Johnson bring together contributions that focus especially on different versions of the cultural account of the mind.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

What holds together the various fields that are supposed to consititute the general intellectual discipline that people now call cognitive science? In this book, Erneling and Johnson identify two problems with defining this discipline. First, some theorists identify the common subject matter as the mind, but scientists and philosophers have not been able to agree on any single, satisfactory answer to the question of what the mind is. Second, those who speculate about the general characteristics that belong to cognitive science tend to assume that all the particular fields falling under the rubric--psychology, linguistics, biology, and son on--are of roughly equal value in their ability to shed light on the nature of mind. This book argues that all the cognitive science disciplines are not equally able to provide answers to ontological questions about the mind, but rather that only neurophysiology and cultural psychology are suited to answer these questions. However, since the cultural account of mind has long been ignored in favor of the neurophysiological account, Erneling and Johnson bring together contributions that focus especially on different versions of the cultural account of the mind.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Philosophical Papers by
Cover of the book The Purse and the Sword by
Cover of the book Preventing Hospital Infections by
Cover of the book Mafia Brotherhoods by
Cover of the book Seven Days of Nectar by
Cover of the book Acts of God by
Cover of the book Islamic Philosophy: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by
Cover of the book Migraine by
Cover of the book God Bless America by
Cover of the book How Things Count as the Same by
Cover of the book Human Social Evolution by
Cover of the book Rudolf Serkin by
Cover of the book Spirit in the Dark by
Cover of the book Roman Reflections by
Cover of the book Flawed Advice and the Management Trap:How Managers Can Know When They're Getting Good Advice and When They're Not by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy