The North American Free Trade Agreement

Economic impacts of the agreement on the United States of America and Mexico in comparison

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book The North American Free Trade Agreement by Marc Grezlikowski, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Marc Grezlikowski ISBN: 9783640381845
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: July 23, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Marc Grezlikowski
ISBN: 9783640381845
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: July 23, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: USA, grade: 2,3, Free University of Berlin, language: English, abstract: In the wake of globalization, many countries are reducing trade barriers and tariffs, resulting in a rise of free-trade areas in which the participating countries trade freely among each other without any restrictions. The goal of these agreements is the increase of wealth in each nation's economy. To reach this goal, the USA, Canada and Mexico negotiated the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which came into effect on January, 1st 1994. It was the world's largest free-trade area with a combined population of over 360m people and a total GDP of 6$ trillion. Today, the NAFTA area comprises a 12.5$ trillion economy and a 430m strong population. For the first time, two highly industrialized, rich countries affiliated themselves with a poorer, newly industrialized country. At the time of its ratification, the agreement was extremely controversial in all three member states and opinions in political camps differed vastly. Supporters of the contract were mostly big companies and investors who were hoping that it would loosen restrictions and barriers on the capital market. Opponents of the agreement were trade unions which, especially in the United States, railed heavily against it. They feared outsourcing and massive job displacements to Mexico, a country in which labor is incredibly cheap and environment protection laws are lax or do not even exist. In Mexico, landowners were skeptical of NAFTA because they feared unfair competition with US-American farmers who are still to this day greatly subsidized by the government.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Region: USA, grade: 2,3, Free University of Berlin, language: English, abstract: In the wake of globalization, many countries are reducing trade barriers and tariffs, resulting in a rise of free-trade areas in which the participating countries trade freely among each other without any restrictions. The goal of these agreements is the increase of wealth in each nation's economy. To reach this goal, the USA, Canada and Mexico negotiated the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which came into effect on January, 1st 1994. It was the world's largest free-trade area with a combined population of over 360m people and a total GDP of 6$ trillion. Today, the NAFTA area comprises a 12.5$ trillion economy and a 430m strong population. For the first time, two highly industrialized, rich countries affiliated themselves with a poorer, newly industrialized country. At the time of its ratification, the agreement was extremely controversial in all three member states and opinions in political camps differed vastly. Supporters of the contract were mostly big companies and investors who were hoping that it would loosen restrictions and barriers on the capital market. Opponents of the agreement were trade unions which, especially in the United States, railed heavily against it. They feared outsourcing and massive job displacements to Mexico, a country in which labor is incredibly cheap and environment protection laws are lax or do not even exist. In Mexico, landowners were skeptical of NAFTA because they feared unfair competition with US-American farmers who are still to this day greatly subsidized by the government.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book On the importance of female bonding in Shakespeare's 'All's Well That Ends Well' by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book A climate for change by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book Reconciling Universalists and Substratists by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book Mitt Romney - Using Technology To Spread His Vision by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book Gerontological counseling by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book Increasing Presence of Documenta Exhibition in Global Civil Society: Methodological Relevance of John Urry's 'Sociology beyond Societies' by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book Hanif Kureishi's 'The Buddha of Suburbia' and the Topic of Racism by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book Does the rise of Emerging Powers challenge the existing notions of development? by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book Konzepte und Werkzeuge zum Online Analytical Processing by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book German and Dutch intercultural communication by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book Foreign Direct Investment in Emerging Markets - Vietnam and Korea by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book Native American Literature - An Analysis of Navaree Scott Momaday's 'House Made of Dawn' by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book Teams and Teamwork as the Basis of Effectiveness by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book The Criticism of Richardson's novel 'Pamela' by Henry Fieldings' 'Shamela' by Marc Grezlikowski
Cover of the book Integrating Environmental Sustainability into the Company's strategy by Marc Grezlikowski
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy