The Philosophical Contexts of Sartre’s The Wall and Other Stories

Stories of Bad Faith

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Aesthetics
Cover of the book The Philosophical Contexts of Sartre’s The Wall and Other Stories by Kevin W. Sweeney, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Kevin W. Sweeney ISBN: 9781498509374
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: May 16, 2016
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Kevin W. Sweeney
ISBN: 9781498509374
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: May 16, 2016
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

The Philosophical Contexts of Sartre’s The Wall and Other Stories*: Stories of Bad Faith* presents a philosophical analysis of all five stories in Sartre’s short-story collection. Kevin W. Sweeney argues that each of the five stories has its own philosophical idea or problem that serves as the context for the narrative. Sartre constructs each story as a reply to the philosophical issue in the context and as support for his position on that issue. In the opening story, “The Wall,” Sartre uses the Constant-Kant debate to support his view that the story’s protagonist is responsible for his ally’s death. “The Room” presents in narrative form Sartre’s criticism that the Freudian Censor is acting in bad faith. In “Erostratus,” Sartre opposes Descartes’s claim in his “hats and coats” example that we recognize the humanity of others by using our reason. In “Intimacy,” Sartre again opposes a Cartesian position, this time the view that our feelings reveal our emotions. Sartre counters that Cartesian view by showing that the two women in the story act in bad faith because they do not distinguish their feelings from their emotions. The last story, “The Childhood of a Leader,” shows how the protagonist acts in bad faith in trying to resolve the question of who he is by appealing to the view that one’s roots in nature can provide one with a substantial identity. The stories are unified by showing the characters in all five narratives engaged in different acts of bad faith.

The Philosophical Contexts of Sartre’s The Wall and Other Stories is written for scholars interested in Jean-Paul Sartre’s early literary and philosophical work, as well as for students interested in Sartre and twentieth-century French literature.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The Philosophical Contexts of Sartre’s The Wall and Other Stories*: Stories of Bad Faith* presents a philosophical analysis of all five stories in Sartre’s short-story collection. Kevin W. Sweeney argues that each of the five stories has its own philosophical idea or problem that serves as the context for the narrative. Sartre constructs each story as a reply to the philosophical issue in the context and as support for his position on that issue. In the opening story, “The Wall,” Sartre uses the Constant-Kant debate to support his view that the story’s protagonist is responsible for his ally’s death. “The Room” presents in narrative form Sartre’s criticism that the Freudian Censor is acting in bad faith. In “Erostratus,” Sartre opposes Descartes’s claim in his “hats and coats” example that we recognize the humanity of others by using our reason. In “Intimacy,” Sartre again opposes a Cartesian position, this time the view that our feelings reveal our emotions. Sartre counters that Cartesian view by showing that the two women in the story act in bad faith because they do not distinguish their feelings from their emotions. The last story, “The Childhood of a Leader,” shows how the protagonist acts in bad faith in trying to resolve the question of who he is by appealing to the view that one’s roots in nature can provide one with a substantial identity. The stories are unified by showing the characters in all five narratives engaged in different acts of bad faith.

The Philosophical Contexts of Sartre’s The Wall and Other Stories is written for scholars interested in Jean-Paul Sartre’s early literary and philosophical work, as well as for students interested in Sartre and twentieth-century French literature.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Statesmanship and Reconstruction by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book Killing Congress by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book Middle East Politics for the New Millennium by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book Impartial Justice by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book Asian Tradition and Cosmopolitan Politics by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book The Dilemma of Sustainability in the Age of Globalization by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book Counterterrorism and Threat Finance Analysis during Wartime by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book Violent Offenders and Their Victims by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book The George W. Bush Presidency by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book Social Networking and Impression Management by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book After the Fall by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book Reality, Reason, and Rights by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book Social Media and Living Well by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book Gabriel Marcel and American Philosophy by Kevin W. Sweeney
Cover of the book A Three-Factor Model of Couples Therapy by Kevin W. Sweeney
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy