The Principle of Non-contradiction in Plato's Republic

An Argument for Form

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Logic, Epistemology
Cover of the book The Principle of Non-contradiction in Plato's Republic by Laurence Bloom, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Laurence Bloom ISBN: 9780739190241
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: March 8, 2017
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Laurence Bloom
ISBN: 9780739190241
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: March 8, 2017
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

Plato’s formulation of the Principle of Non-contradiction (PNC) in Republic IV is the first full statement of the principle in western philosophy. His use of the principle might seem to suggest that he endorses the PNC. After all, how could one possibly deny so fundamental a principle—especially when it seems difficult to deny it without relying on it. However, the endorsement in the text is qualified. Socrates refers to the principle as one that he and his interlocutors will hypothesize and warns that if it should ever be shown to be false, all that follows from it will also be refuted. Scholars who have noticed this issue have tended to assume that the truth of the hypothesis in question can be guaranteed. Laurence Bloom argues against unthinkingly accepting this claim. He suggests that what emerges from the text is more sophisticated: Plato’s concession that the PNC is hypothetical is a textual clue pointing us to a complex philosophical argument that grounds the PNC, as well as the sort of reasoning it grounds, in form. Indeed, in framing the problem in this way, we can read the Republic as providing an extended argument for form.

The argument for forms that emerges is complex and difficult. It is not and cannot be a normal, discursive argument. Indeed, the argument cannot even be one that assumes the PNC; if it did so, it would fall prey to a vicious circularity. Rather, the argument rests on the very possibility of our hypothesizing the PNC in the first place. Our ability to hypothesize the PNC—and perhaps our inability not to hypothesize it—is the linchpin. When we ask questions such as “to what objects does the PNC apply?” or “how is it possible that we apply the PNC?,” we are asking questions that lead us to the existence of form. The Principle of Non-contradiction in Plato’s Republic also explores the soul of the knower—the very entity to which and by which the principle is applied in the text—and its underlying unity.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Plato’s formulation of the Principle of Non-contradiction (PNC) in Republic IV is the first full statement of the principle in western philosophy. His use of the principle might seem to suggest that he endorses the PNC. After all, how could one possibly deny so fundamental a principle—especially when it seems difficult to deny it without relying on it. However, the endorsement in the text is qualified. Socrates refers to the principle as one that he and his interlocutors will hypothesize and warns that if it should ever be shown to be false, all that follows from it will also be refuted. Scholars who have noticed this issue have tended to assume that the truth of the hypothesis in question can be guaranteed. Laurence Bloom argues against unthinkingly accepting this claim. He suggests that what emerges from the text is more sophisticated: Plato’s concession that the PNC is hypothetical is a textual clue pointing us to a complex philosophical argument that grounds the PNC, as well as the sort of reasoning it grounds, in form. Indeed, in framing the problem in this way, we can read the Republic as providing an extended argument for form.

The argument for forms that emerges is complex and difficult. It is not and cannot be a normal, discursive argument. Indeed, the argument cannot even be one that assumes the PNC; if it did so, it would fall prey to a vicious circularity. Rather, the argument rests on the very possibility of our hypothesizing the PNC in the first place. Our ability to hypothesize the PNC—and perhaps our inability not to hypothesize it—is the linchpin. When we ask questions such as “to what objects does the PNC apply?” or “how is it possible that we apply the PNC?,” we are asking questions that lead us to the existence of form. The Principle of Non-contradiction in Plato’s Republic also explores the soul of the knower—the very entity to which and by which the principle is applied in the text—and its underlying unity.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Deadly Thought by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Post-Holocaust Jewish–Christian Dialogue by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Reproducing Chinese Culture in Diaspora by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book The Rhetorical Power of Children's Literature by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Zhang Zai's Philosophy of Qi by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book The Philosophies of Richard Wagner by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Adorno and Philosophical Modernism by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Healing in the Homeland by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Waves of Social Movement Mobilizations in the Twenty-First Century by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Global Perspectives on Prostitution and Sex Trafficking by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Isabelle Eberhardt and North Africa by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Idealism, Pragmatism, and Feminism by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Understanding Adolescent Immigrants by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Ecocriticism, Ecology, and the Cultures of Antiquity by Laurence Bloom
Cover of the book Incarcerated Women by Laurence Bloom
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy