The Priority of Democracy

Political Consequences of Pragmatism

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, Leadership, Government, Democracy
Cover of the book The Priority of Democracy by Jack Knight, James Johnson, Princeton University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Jack Knight, James Johnson ISBN: 9781400840335
Publisher: Princeton University Press Publication: August 22, 2011
Imprint: Princeton University Press Language: English
Author: Jack Knight, James Johnson
ISBN: 9781400840335
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Publication: August 22, 2011
Imprint: Princeton University Press
Language: English

Pragmatism and its consequences are central issues in American politics today, yet scholars rarely examine in detail the relationship between pragmatism and politics. In The Priority of Democracy, Jack Knight and James Johnson systematically explore the subject and make a strong case for adopting a pragmatist approach to democratic politics--and for giving priority to democracy in the process of selecting and reforming political institutions.

What is the primary value of democracy? When should we make decisions democratically and when should we rely on markets? And when should we accept the decisions of unelected officials, such as judges or bureaucrats? Knight and Johnson explore how a commitment to pragmatism should affect our answers to such important questions. They conclude that democracy is a good way of determining how these kinds of decisions should be made--even if what the democratic process determines is that not all decisions should be made democratically. So, for example, the democratically elected U.S. Congress may legitimately remove monetary policy from democratic decision-making by putting it under the control of the Federal Reserve.

Knight and Johnson argue that pragmatism offers an original and compelling justification of democracy in terms of the unique contributions democratic institutions can make to processes of institutional choice. This focus highlights the important role that democracy plays, not in achieving consensus or commonality, but rather in addressing conflicts. Indeed, Knight and Johnson suggest that democratic politics is perhaps best seen less as a way of reaching consensus or agreement than as a way of structuring the terms of persistent disagreement.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Pragmatism and its consequences are central issues in American politics today, yet scholars rarely examine in detail the relationship between pragmatism and politics. In The Priority of Democracy, Jack Knight and James Johnson systematically explore the subject and make a strong case for adopting a pragmatist approach to democratic politics--and for giving priority to democracy in the process of selecting and reforming political institutions.

What is the primary value of democracy? When should we make decisions democratically and when should we rely on markets? And when should we accept the decisions of unelected officials, such as judges or bureaucrats? Knight and Johnson explore how a commitment to pragmatism should affect our answers to such important questions. They conclude that democracy is a good way of determining how these kinds of decisions should be made--even if what the democratic process determines is that not all decisions should be made democratically. So, for example, the democratically elected U.S. Congress may legitimately remove monetary policy from democratic decision-making by putting it under the control of the Federal Reserve.

Knight and Johnson argue that pragmatism offers an original and compelling justification of democracy in terms of the unique contributions democratic institutions can make to processes of institutional choice. This focus highlights the important role that democracy plays, not in achieving consensus or commonality, but rather in addressing conflicts. Indeed, Knight and Johnson suggest that democratic politics is perhaps best seen less as a way of reaching consensus or agreement than as a way of structuring the terms of persistent disagreement.

More books from Princeton University Press

Cover of the book The Constitution of Ancient China by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book The Lesser Evil by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book Citizen and Subject by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book Primates and Philosophers: How Morality Evolved by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book Braintrust by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book A Wealth of Numbers by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book Genealogy of the Tragic by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book Chow Rings, Decomposition of the Diagonal, and the Topology of Families (AM-187) by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book (God) After Auschwitz by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book Lydia Ginzburg's Prose by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book The Dynamics of Risk by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book Platonic Noise by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book The Enculturated Gene by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book American Babylon by Jack Knight, James Johnson
Cover of the book Soft Force by Jack Knight, James Johnson
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy