Welfare for the Wealthy

Parties, Social Spending, and Inequality in the United States

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Social Science, Business & Finance
Cover of the book Welfare for the Wealthy by Christopher G. Faricy, Cambridge University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Christopher G. Faricy ISBN: 9781316349458
Publisher: Cambridge University Press Publication: October 22, 2015
Imprint: Cambridge University Press Language: English
Author: Christopher G. Faricy
ISBN: 9781316349458
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Publication: October 22, 2015
Imprint: Cambridge University Press
Language: English

How does political party control determine changes to social policy, and by extension, influence inequality in America? Conventional theories show that Democratic control of the federal government produces more social expenditures and less inequality. Welfare for the Wealthy re-examines this relationship by evaluating how political party power results in changes to both public social spending and subsidies for private welfare - and how a trade-off between the two, in turn, affects income inequality. Christopher Faricy finds that both Democrats and Republicans have increased social spending over the last forty-two years. And while both political parties increase federal social spending, Democrats and Republicans differ in how they spend federal money, which socioeconomic groups benefit, and the resulting consequences for income inequality.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

How does political party control determine changes to social policy, and by extension, influence inequality in America? Conventional theories show that Democratic control of the federal government produces more social expenditures and less inequality. Welfare for the Wealthy re-examines this relationship by evaluating how political party power results in changes to both public social spending and subsidies for private welfare - and how a trade-off between the two, in turn, affects income inequality. Christopher Faricy finds that both Democrats and Republicans have increased social spending over the last forty-two years. And while both political parties increase federal social spending, Democrats and Republicans differ in how they spend federal money, which socioeconomic groups benefit, and the resulting consequences for income inequality.

More books from Cambridge University Press

Cover of the book The Impact of Discovering Life beyond Earth by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Hard-to-Survey Populations by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book The Politics of Wine in Early Modern France by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Property in the Body by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book The Schematic State by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book The Cambridge History of Capitalism: Volume 1, The Rise of Capitalism: From Ancient Origins to 1848 by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre and Literature of the Absurd by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Neuromorphic and Brain-Based Robots by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book The Taming of the Shrew by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book The Loyalist Problem in Revolutionary New England by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Hillslope Hydrology and Stability by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book A Republic of Law by Christopher G. Faricy
Cover of the book The Nature-Nurture Debates by Christopher G. Faricy
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy