Western philosophy from mysticism to analytical logic in 3 and a half hours

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book Western philosophy from mysticism to analytical logic in 3 and a half hours by Claudio Ferazzani, Youcanprint
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Claudio Ferazzani ISBN: 9788827826270
Publisher: Youcanprint Publication: May 5, 2018
Imprint: Language: English
Author: Claudio Ferazzani
ISBN: 9788827826270
Publisher: Youcanprint
Publication: May 5, 2018
Imprint:
Language: English

The philosophers have never conceived their theses as contingents at a given epoch, but applicable at all times:
So let us reread them without justifying them with the historical moment, and explain them as interdependent: of what appears to be a carousel of presumptuous ideas, we have looked for the logic that is underneath; of the concepts of mathematical minds, we have brought back the connections to everyday life.
The oppositions present are, for example, the question of Augustine asking himself "Si Deus est, unde malum?", we find that Leibniz responds by imagining a palace of destinies and the compossibility of a path of choices, ending up to be content with the best of all possible worlds: he only wants to propose free the will of man, to leave the supreme being univocal and uniform, avoiding the Manichaeism of a good and a bad divinity, which would not support the monotheism of supreme goodness and wisdom.
And again, if Heraclitus notes that everything flows (panta rei), Hegel explains that the spirit of history forces the thesis of the moment to be inevitably overcome by the antitheses with the thesis-antithesis-synthesis program (and the Prussian state is destined to guide of civilization). Marx interprets this dialectic with materialism, since the economic situation determines all the others (the proletarian class is scientifically destined to assume the dictatorship of the state). But against those (Platonic, Christian and Socialist) who subject individual wishes to intellectual leadership, Kierkegaard prefers the independence of the individual rather than any historical necessity. And for those who exhort the endurance of the present for the future, Nietzsche warns us not to behave as if we were on our way to a goal, but to take root in the immanence of every single moment.
When the positivists ensure that technological progress will solve any doubt, others do not accept the factual judgments of science, aiming at the value judgments of philosophy, the Kantian light of a priori knowledge, at value in relation to the subject, and not scientifically defined value, not independent value of the object, as Wildeband says in intellectually modern terms, but repeating in essence the maxim of Berkeley "esse est percipi", to exist means to be perceived. And this also concerns the mill of Don Quixote, which would be a mill for Aristotle, which brings all the substances to its category, but a dangerous handpiece for the crazy knight who thus perceives its existence.
Anyway, we have not neglected any influential thinker, or almost, to allow you not to read the heavy texts of the various Critics of Kant and the slow readings of Plato, while reporting some original passages to leave them as they are.
Returning to reading them as if philosophers wanted to develop a logical path for phylein (love) - sophya (knowledge), we will recognize from which reminiscences the intellectuals of today are influenced.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The philosophers have never conceived their theses as contingents at a given epoch, but applicable at all times:
So let us reread them without justifying them with the historical moment, and explain them as interdependent: of what appears to be a carousel of presumptuous ideas, we have looked for the logic that is underneath; of the concepts of mathematical minds, we have brought back the connections to everyday life.
The oppositions present are, for example, the question of Augustine asking himself "Si Deus est, unde malum?", we find that Leibniz responds by imagining a palace of destinies and the compossibility of a path of choices, ending up to be content with the best of all possible worlds: he only wants to propose free the will of man, to leave the supreme being univocal and uniform, avoiding the Manichaeism of a good and a bad divinity, which would not support the monotheism of supreme goodness and wisdom.
And again, if Heraclitus notes that everything flows (panta rei), Hegel explains that the spirit of history forces the thesis of the moment to be inevitably overcome by the antitheses with the thesis-antithesis-synthesis program (and the Prussian state is destined to guide of civilization). Marx interprets this dialectic with materialism, since the economic situation determines all the others (the proletarian class is scientifically destined to assume the dictatorship of the state). But against those (Platonic, Christian and Socialist) who subject individual wishes to intellectual leadership, Kierkegaard prefers the independence of the individual rather than any historical necessity. And for those who exhort the endurance of the present for the future, Nietzsche warns us not to behave as if we were on our way to a goal, but to take root in the immanence of every single moment.
When the positivists ensure that technological progress will solve any doubt, others do not accept the factual judgments of science, aiming at the value judgments of philosophy, the Kantian light of a priori knowledge, at value in relation to the subject, and not scientifically defined value, not independent value of the object, as Wildeband says in intellectually modern terms, but repeating in essence the maxim of Berkeley "esse est percipi", to exist means to be perceived. And this also concerns the mill of Don Quixote, which would be a mill for Aristotle, which brings all the substances to its category, but a dangerous handpiece for the crazy knight who thus perceives its existence.
Anyway, we have not neglected any influential thinker, or almost, to allow you not to read the heavy texts of the various Critics of Kant and the slow readings of Plato, while reporting some original passages to leave them as they are.
Returning to reading them as if philosophers wanted to develop a logical path for phylein (love) - sophya (knowledge), we will recognize from which reminiscences the intellectuals of today are influenced.

More books from Youcanprint

Cover of the book Dalla parte di Zoroastro. Leonardo da Vinci visto da un’altra prospettiva by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book A tavola con le stelle. Astrologia e alimentazione by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book Rapporti tra Stato e Chiesa. La Conciliazione del 1929 by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book Gioco e tempo libero by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book Il cielo contro di noi by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book Consigli preziosi per una famiglia felice by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book ABC...del TANGO ARGENTINO, TANGO VALS E TANGO MILONGA by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book Solo una storia d'amore e di troppe paturnie by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book I metodi psicologici di osservazione dei comportamenti in età evolutiva by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book Un'annata straordinaria by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book Stregheria by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book Sogni a Spicchi - La Risposta by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book El mar, una vela... Un sueno by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book Colloqui. Riflessioni sulla Comunicazione con digressioni su Linguistica e Netiquette by Claudio Ferazzani
Cover of the book I Delitti di Castelmorte by Claudio Ferazzani
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy