Where Economics Went Wrong

Chicago's Abandonment of Classical Liberalism

Business & Finance, Economics, Theory of Economics, Economic History
Cover of the book Where Economics Went Wrong by David Colander, Craig Freedman, Princeton University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: David Colander, Craig Freedman ISBN: 9780691184050
Publisher: Princeton University Press Publication: November 27, 2018
Imprint: Princeton University Press Language: English
Author: David Colander, Craig Freedman
ISBN: 9780691184050
Publisher: Princeton University Press
Publication: November 27, 2018
Imprint: Princeton University Press
Language: English

How modern economics abandoned classical liberalism and lost its way

Milton Friedman once predicted that advances in scientific economics would resolve debates about whether raising the minimum wage is good policy. Decades later, Friedman’s prediction has not come true. In Where Economics Went Wrong, David Colander and Craig Freedman argue that it never will. Why? Because economic policy, when done correctly, is an art and a craft. It is not, and cannot be, a science. The authors explain why classical liberal economists understood this essential difference, why modern economists abandoned it, and why now is the time for the profession to return to its classical liberal roots.

Carefully distinguishing policy from science and theory, classical liberal economists emphasized values and context, treating economic policy analysis as a moral science where a dialogue of sensibilities and judgments allowed for the same scientific basis to arrive at a variety of policy recommendations. Using the University of Chicago—one of the last bastions of classical liberal economics—as a case study, Colander and Freedman examine how both the MIT and Chicago variants of modern economics eschewed classical liberalism in their attempt to make economic policy analysis a science. By examining the way in which the discipline managed to lose its bearings, the authors delve into such issues as the development of welfare economics in relation to economic science, alternative voices within the Chicago School, and exactly how Friedman got it wrong.

Contending that the division between science and prescription needs to be restored, Where Economics Went Wrong makes the case for a more nuanced and self-aware policy analysis by economists.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

How modern economics abandoned classical liberalism and lost its way

Milton Friedman once predicted that advances in scientific economics would resolve debates about whether raising the minimum wage is good policy. Decades later, Friedman’s prediction has not come true. In Where Economics Went Wrong, David Colander and Craig Freedman argue that it never will. Why? Because economic policy, when done correctly, is an art and a craft. It is not, and cannot be, a science. The authors explain why classical liberal economists understood this essential difference, why modern economists abandoned it, and why now is the time for the profession to return to its classical liberal roots.

Carefully distinguishing policy from science and theory, classical liberal economists emphasized values and context, treating economic policy analysis as a moral science where a dialogue of sensibilities and judgments allowed for the same scientific basis to arrive at a variety of policy recommendations. Using the University of Chicago—one of the last bastions of classical liberal economics—as a case study, Colander and Freedman examine how both the MIT and Chicago variants of modern economics eschewed classical liberalism in their attempt to make economic policy analysis a science. By examining the way in which the discipline managed to lose its bearings, the authors delve into such issues as the development of welfare economics in relation to economic science, alternative voices within the Chicago School, and exactly how Friedman got it wrong.

Contending that the division between science and prescription needs to be restored, Where Economics Went Wrong makes the case for a more nuanced and self-aware policy analysis by economists.

More books from Princeton University Press

Cover of the book The Original Folk and Fairy Tales of the Brothers Grimm by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book On Beauty and Being Just by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book The Supreme Court and Religion in American Life, Vol. 2 by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Margins and Metropolis by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book The Grand Strategy of the Habsburg Empire by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Lost Enlightenment by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Modernity's Wager by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Not in the Heavens by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book The Order of Terror by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book When They Severed Earth from Sky by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book Dragonflies and Damselflies by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book On War and Democracy by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book The New Arab Man by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book The Brooklyn Nobody Knows by David Colander, Craig Freedman
Cover of the book The "Book of Common Prayer" by David Colander, Craig Freedman
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy