American Parties in Context

Comparative and Historical Analysis

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book American Parties in Context by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda ISBN: 9781135015428
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: April 14, 2016
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
ISBN: 9781135015428
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: April 14, 2016
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

Roughly sixty-five years ago, a group of political scientists operating as the "Committee on Political Parties" of the American Political Association thought long and hard about whether the American parties were adequately serving their democracy, and made specific recommendations for improvements. Comparing the parties of this country to those of Great Britain, the Committee found the American parties to be lacking in such fundamentals as clear policy differences, strong and effective organization, and unity of purpose among each party’s representatives in public offices.

Starting from that background, this book is intended to significantly enhance students‘ understanding of the American parties today by putting them in broader context. How do the twenty-first century Democrats and Republicans compare to the APSA Committee’s "responsible parties model" of the mid-twentieth? And how do the American parties compare to parties of other democracies around the world, including especially the British parties?

Harmel, Giebert, and Janda answer those questions and, in the process, demonstrate that the American parties have moved significantly in the direction of the responsible parties model, but while showing little inclination for implementing the greater discipline the Committee thought essential. Already having provided as much ideological choice as the British parties, the US parties have now edged closer on the other critical requirement of legislative cohesion. The authors show that the latter has resulted "naturally" from the greater homogenization of the meaning of "Democrat" and "Republican" across the country, both within the electorate and now within Congress as well. The dramatic increase in cohesion is not the product of greater party discipline, but rather of sectoral realignments.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Roughly sixty-five years ago, a group of political scientists operating as the "Committee on Political Parties" of the American Political Association thought long and hard about whether the American parties were adequately serving their democracy, and made specific recommendations for improvements. Comparing the parties of this country to those of Great Britain, the Committee found the American parties to be lacking in such fundamentals as clear policy differences, strong and effective organization, and unity of purpose among each party’s representatives in public offices.

Starting from that background, this book is intended to significantly enhance students‘ understanding of the American parties today by putting them in broader context. How do the twenty-first century Democrats and Republicans compare to the APSA Committee’s "responsible parties model" of the mid-twentieth? And how do the American parties compare to parties of other democracies around the world, including especially the British parties?

Harmel, Giebert, and Janda answer those questions and, in the process, demonstrate that the American parties have moved significantly in the direction of the responsible parties model, but while showing little inclination for implementing the greater discipline the Committee thought essential. Already having provided as much ideological choice as the British parties, the US parties have now edged closer on the other critical requirement of legislative cohesion. The authors show that the latter has resulted "naturally" from the greater homogenization of the meaning of "Democrat" and "Republican" across the country, both within the electorate and now within Congress as well. The dramatic increase in cohesion is not the product of greater party discipline, but rather of sectoral realignments.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Epistolary Selves by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book Modern Political Thinkers and Ideas by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book The United Nations World Water Development Report 3 by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book Copyrighting Culture by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book Film and Ethics by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book The Elements of Inquiry by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book Exploring Language Assessment and Testing by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book Teaching Bibliography, Textual Criticism and Book History by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book Now Urbanism by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book Rethinking Health Promotion by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book Experiments in Quantitative Finance by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book Corporate Truth by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book Bipolar Puzzle Solution by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book Socioeconomic Outcomes of the Global Financial Crisis by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
Cover of the book The Rhetoric of Risk by Robert Harmel, Matthew Giebert, Kenneth Janda
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy