Comments on Steven Mithen's Book (1996) The Prehistory of The Mind

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Education & Teaching, Study Skills, Science & Nature, Science, Biological Sciences, Evolution
Cover of the book Comments on Steven Mithen's Book (1996) The Prehistory of The Mind by Razie Mah, Razie Mah
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Razie Mah ISBN: 9781942824411
Publisher: Razie Mah Publication: February 3, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Razie Mah
ISBN: 9781942824411
Publisher: Razie Mah
Publication: February 3, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

Over twenty years ago, Steven Mithen, a British archaeologist, published one of the most eloquently written books on human evolution. The Prehistory of The Mind (1996) frames the past six million years with two evocative analogies. The first is a play in four acts. The second is the evolution of church architecture in the West.
These powerful metaphors do not explain human evolution. They re-describe it, bringing to the fore the character of the evidence as well as the cognition that goes with the evidence. The first two acts describe the evolution of primate general intelligence leading to a turn toward specialized cognition. The third act describes the evolution of the "Romanesque" mind of Homo erectus. Here, specialized intelligences come to the fore.
The fourth act describes a breakdown of the walls of the separate "chapels" of specialized intelligence, forming the "Gothic" mind of anatomically modern humans. General intelligence was transformed, perhaps through language, into an open space for meta-representation. Mithen calls the result: cognitive fluidity.
The Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition exemplifies cognitive fluidity. Tools fit the job. Religion is everywhere. The art is beautiful.
These comments add one ingredient to Mithen's argument. They present the human niche. The cognitive adaptations of the hominins exploit the human niche. Thus, Mithen's re-depiction of human evolution finds footing in biology. His metaphors are rich. Now, they carry more than they did before.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Over twenty years ago, Steven Mithen, a British archaeologist, published one of the most eloquently written books on human evolution. The Prehistory of The Mind (1996) frames the past six million years with two evocative analogies. The first is a play in four acts. The second is the evolution of church architecture in the West.
These powerful metaphors do not explain human evolution. They re-describe it, bringing to the fore the character of the evidence as well as the cognition that goes with the evidence. The first two acts describe the evolution of primate general intelligence leading to a turn toward specialized cognition. The third act describes the evolution of the "Romanesque" mind of Homo erectus. Here, specialized intelligences come to the fore.
The fourth act describes a breakdown of the walls of the separate "chapels" of specialized intelligence, forming the "Gothic" mind of anatomically modern humans. General intelligence was transformed, perhaps through language, into an open space for meta-representation. Mithen calls the result: cognitive fluidity.
The Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition exemplifies cognitive fluidity. Tools fit the job. Religion is everywhere. The art is beautiful.
These comments add one ingredient to Mithen's argument. They present the human niche. The cognitive adaptations of the hominins exploit the human niche. Thus, Mithen's re-depiction of human evolution finds footing in biology. His metaphors are rich. Now, they carry more than they did before.

More books from Razie Mah

Cover of the book Comments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on How Institutions Think by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Clive Gamble, John Gowlett and Robin Dunbar’s Book (2014) Thinking Big by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding: A Key Triad" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Daniel Novotny’s Book (2013) Ens Rationis from Suarez to Caramuel by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory by Razie Mah
Cover of the book The First Primer on the Organization Tier by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Cheong Lee's Essay (2018) "Peirce's Theory of Interpretation" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Matthew Minerd’s Essay (2019) "Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Jacques Maritain's Book (1935) Philosophy of Nature by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Thomas Hobbes Book (1651) The Leviathan Part 3 by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Roger Teichmann’s Article (2016) The Identity of a Word by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve by Razie Mah
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy