Comments on Thomas Hobbes Book (1651) The Leviathan Part 1

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Education & Teaching, Home Schooling, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Sociology
Cover of the book Comments on Thomas Hobbes Book (1651) The Leviathan Part 1 by Razie Mah, Razie Mah
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Razie Mah ISBN: 9781942824213
Publisher: Razie Mah Publication: November 25, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Razie Mah
ISBN: 9781942824213
Publisher: Razie Mah
Publication: November 25, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

Modernism belongs to the Age of Ideas. According to John Deely, two figures mark the turning point from the Latin Age to the Age of Ideas. They are Rene Descartes, pointing the way to the Age of Ideas, and John Poinsot, arriving at the triadic nature of the sign relation. The time is 1650 AD.
These comments examine a book published in 1651 AD, precisely at the turning identified by John Deely. In The Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes builds a model of the subject and the commonwealth based on natural civil laws.
Hobbes’ description of the subject and the commonwealth intimate the modern concepts of the citizen and the civil state. For that reason, he was called a monster. He is the prophet of the modern totalitarian state.
These comments differ from modernist commentaries, which try to identify where Hobbes went wrong, his system of thought, and so on. Instead, they show that Hobbes’ models of speech and power are relational structures. They are precisely the types of structures that John Poinsot elucidated in the waning days of the Latin Age. They are also the types of structures that Thomas Hobbes rejected in his human mechanical philosophy.
Part 1 is entitled, “On Man”.
In my comments, I use the category-based nested form to show that the subject and commonwealth match the content and situation levels of the society tier. The society tier was introduced in the foundational work: How To Define the Word “Religion”.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Modernism belongs to the Age of Ideas. According to John Deely, two figures mark the turning point from the Latin Age to the Age of Ideas. They are Rene Descartes, pointing the way to the Age of Ideas, and John Poinsot, arriving at the triadic nature of the sign relation. The time is 1650 AD.
These comments examine a book published in 1651 AD, precisely at the turning identified by John Deely. In The Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes builds a model of the subject and the commonwealth based on natural civil laws.
Hobbes’ description of the subject and the commonwealth intimate the modern concepts of the citizen and the civil state. For that reason, he was called a monster. He is the prophet of the modern totalitarian state.
These comments differ from modernist commentaries, which try to identify where Hobbes went wrong, his system of thought, and so on. Instead, they show that Hobbes’ models of speech and power are relational structures. They are precisely the types of structures that John Poinsot elucidated in the waning days of the Latin Age. They are also the types of structures that Thomas Hobbes rejected in his human mechanical philosophy.
Part 1 is entitled, “On Man”.
In my comments, I use the category-based nested form to show that the subject and commonwealth match the content and situation levels of the society tier. The society tier was introduced in the foundational work: How To Define the Word “Religion”.

More books from Razie Mah

Cover of the book Comments on Thomas Hobbes Book (1651) The Leviathan Part 4 by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Sasha Newell's Article (2018) "The Affectiveness of Symbols" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Steven Mithen's Book (1996) The Prehistory of The Mind by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on John Deely's Book (1994) New Beginnings by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Jacques Lacan’s (1960) Discourse to Catholics by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer for Individual In Community by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Carlos Blanco-Perez's Essay (2018) "On the Principles of a Social Theory" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book The Inevitable Twist: Comments on Lamoureux’s Question by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Roger Teichmann’s Article (2016) The Identity of a Word by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on “A Bio-Cultural-Historical Approach to the Study of Development (2016)” by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer on How Institutions Think by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on George Weigel’s Book (2007) Faith, Reason and the War against Jihadism by Razie Mah
Cover of the book The First Singularity and Its Fairy Tale Trace by Razie Mah
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy