Constructivism and Rationalism

Antagonistic or Complementary?

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Relations
Cover of the book Constructivism and Rationalism by Samuel Schmid, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Samuel Schmid ISBN: 9783640904600
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: May 2, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Samuel Schmid
ISBN: 9783640904600
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: May 2, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Essay from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - International Politics - General and Theories, grade: 1.0, University of Luzern, course: Hauptseminar 'International Cooperation', language: English, abstract: With the so-called constructivist turn in the social sciences, the relevance of ideational elements for (the construction of) social reality has been increasingly acknowledged. In political science, ideas and norms were always a concern, but never became central until this turn that started out around 1990 (Finnemore and Sikkink 1998: 890). So, it is rather a return to traditional positions and research interests than a mere turn, but with the decisive difference that ideational factors (such as ideas, norms, frames, paradigms, identities etc.) are viewed as the most pivotal ingredients for political results - at least by constructivists themselves (ibid. 888). Rationalists apparently reject these assumptions by labeling interests and according rational behavior as the most crucial elements for political outcomes. Thus, in International Relations Theory, '[t]he opposition of constructivist and 'rationalist' arguments that has become widespread [...] implies that the issues constructivists study (norms, identities) are not rational and, similarly, that 'rationalists' cannot or do not treat norms or identities in their research programs' (Finnemore and Sikkink 1998: 909). But is that really true? Do rationalism and constructivism exclude each other in this respect? Or, in other words, are concepts like ideas, norms, and identities more antagonistic than complementary to the notion of rational utility-maximization? In this essay, I argue that, while materialism (as in classical realism) is clearly opposed to constructivism, rationalism is more complementary than contradictory to constructivism (or vice-versa; see Hurd 2010). Furthermore, this view could also lead to a more fruitful debate. In order to show this, first, the three approaches relevant here (materialism, rationalism, and constructivism) are outlined in relation to each other. Second, the core assumptions of constructivism are discussed in light of this context. Third, I reflect on ideas and interests - which are often seen as antagonistic concepts - and show how their relationship is more complex than normally considered. Finally, the concluding discussion tries to come up with a potential answer to the outlined question.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - International Politics - General and Theories, grade: 1.0, University of Luzern, course: Hauptseminar 'International Cooperation', language: English, abstract: With the so-called constructivist turn in the social sciences, the relevance of ideational elements for (the construction of) social reality has been increasingly acknowledged. In political science, ideas and norms were always a concern, but never became central until this turn that started out around 1990 (Finnemore and Sikkink 1998: 890). So, it is rather a return to traditional positions and research interests than a mere turn, but with the decisive difference that ideational factors (such as ideas, norms, frames, paradigms, identities etc.) are viewed as the most pivotal ingredients for political results - at least by constructivists themselves (ibid. 888). Rationalists apparently reject these assumptions by labeling interests and according rational behavior as the most crucial elements for political outcomes. Thus, in International Relations Theory, '[t]he opposition of constructivist and 'rationalist' arguments that has become widespread [...] implies that the issues constructivists study (norms, identities) are not rational and, similarly, that 'rationalists' cannot or do not treat norms or identities in their research programs' (Finnemore and Sikkink 1998: 909). But is that really true? Do rationalism and constructivism exclude each other in this respect? Or, in other words, are concepts like ideas, norms, and identities more antagonistic than complementary to the notion of rational utility-maximization? In this essay, I argue that, while materialism (as in classical realism) is clearly opposed to constructivism, rationalism is more complementary than contradictory to constructivism (or vice-versa; see Hurd 2010). Furthermore, this view could also lead to a more fruitful debate. In order to show this, first, the three approaches relevant here (materialism, rationalism, and constructivism) are outlined in relation to each other. Second, the core assumptions of constructivism are discussed in light of this context. Third, I reflect on ideas and interests - which are often seen as antagonistic concepts - and show how their relationship is more complex than normally considered. Finally, the concluding discussion tries to come up with a potential answer to the outlined question.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book European Problems - Challenges of the European Union by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book Life cycle costing. Advantages, disadvantages and criticism of this procedure by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book 'Out of the Dark into the Light' - The changing attitude of Cosima Noline towards death alters her life by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book Particle movement in phrasal verbs by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book Market Segmentation and Branding in the Hotel Industry by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book Die Insel Panarea by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book Highly skilled labour migration: Consequences for labour exporting countries by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart - Bridging Cultural Differences by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book In what ways did Deng Xiaoping's chosen developmental path for China differ from Mao Zedong's? by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book The Mental Lexicon by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book The oil crisis in the 1970s and its consequences for the world economy by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book Aid or Trade - Alternatives for Poverty Reduction? by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book Simulation and mirror neurons. Evidence in humans and monkeys by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book The application of three major characteristics of liturgy as seen in the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults to Pastoral Care of the Sick and Dying by Samuel Schmid
Cover of the book Musterkolonie Kiatschou by Samuel Schmid
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy