Contested Issues in the Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse

A Response to Questions Raised in Kuehnle and Connell's Edited Collection

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Medical, Patient Care, Health Care Delivery, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Social Work
Cover of the book Contested Issues in the Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse by , Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9781317683681
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: January 8, 2016
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9781317683681
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: January 8, 2016
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

This book represents a significant contribution to the highly contested debate surrounding how allegations of child sexual abuse should be evaluated. Despite decades of substantial research in this sensitive area, professional consensus remains elusive. A particular source of contention is the sensitivity vs. specificity debate; whether evaluators should aim to reduce the number of true allegations that are labelled false or to reduce the number of false allegations that are labelled true.

This edited collection aims to address directly and offer new insights into this debate. It responds directly to Kuehnle and Connell's edited volume, The Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse Allegations: A Comprehensive Guide to Assessment and Testimony (2009), which included chapters which advocated strong specificity positions at the expense of sensitivity. The chapters in this collection feature both challenges to, and replies by, the authors in Kuehnle and Connell's book, making this an essential resource that moves the debate forward.

This book was originally published as a special issue of the Journal of Child Sexual Abuse.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book represents a significant contribution to the highly contested debate surrounding how allegations of child sexual abuse should be evaluated. Despite decades of substantial research in this sensitive area, professional consensus remains elusive. A particular source of contention is the sensitivity vs. specificity debate; whether evaluators should aim to reduce the number of true allegations that are labelled false or to reduce the number of false allegations that are labelled true.

This edited collection aims to address directly and offer new insights into this debate. It responds directly to Kuehnle and Connell's edited volume, The Evaluation of Child Sexual Abuse Allegations: A Comprehensive Guide to Assessment and Testimony (2009), which included chapters which advocated strong specificity positions at the expense of sensitivity. The chapters in this collection feature both challenges to, and replies by, the authors in Kuehnle and Connell's book, making this an essential resource that moves the debate forward.

This book was originally published as a special issue of the Journal of Child Sexual Abuse.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Social Care with African Families in the UK by
Cover of the book American Literature in Context by
Cover of the book China, Xinjiang and Central Asia by
Cover of the book The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals by
Cover of the book Bolsheviks and British Jews by
Cover of the book The Postcolonial Exotic by
Cover of the book Strange Histories by
Cover of the book Introduction to Film Studies by
Cover of the book Project Management Revised Edition by
Cover of the book Caged Women by
Cover of the book Pan-Caribbean Integration by
Cover of the book Power-Sharing and Political Stability in Deeply Divided Societies by
Cover of the book High-Impact Leadership for High-Impact Schools by
Cover of the book Social Media Freaks by
Cover of the book Congressional Representation & Constituents by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy