Does a Grounded Theory dissociated from its epistemological bases make sense?

The example of Charmaz's Constructivist Grounded Theory

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Methodology
Cover of the book Does a Grounded Theory dissociated from its epistemological bases make sense? by Anna-Maria Damalis, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Anna-Maria Damalis ISBN: 9783656167174
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: April 10, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Anna-Maria Damalis
ISBN: 9783656167174
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: April 10, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Sociology - Methodology and Methods, grade: 1,3, University of Tubingen, language: English, abstract: I.Introduction Since the first publication of Grounded Theory (in the following GT) by Anselm L. Strauss and Barney Glaser in 1967, a lot of scientists and researchers have written about, applied and reformulated this theory-building method. What is lacking in many of these works is GT's acknowledgement as a methodology. Many researchers have applied the procedures proposed by Strauss and Glaser, but they do not seem to be aware of the epistemological implications resulting from the use of the GT method. As Strauss together with his co-author Juliet Corbin stated: 'In this book (Basics of Qualitative Research, BD/CL), we are offering more than a set of procedures. We are offering a way of thinking about and of viewing the world that can enrich the research of those who choose to use this methodology.' (Strauss/ Corbin 1998: 4) Kathy Charmaz appears to be an exception in this canon, since she is not only thinking about the philosophy of knowledge behind GT, but also attempting to renew the epistemological groundings of GT in the field of constructivism. This leads us to the main question of this thesis: Is this possible? Can the GT method be abstracted from the epistemology standing behind it and be founded on a new one? An affirmative answer would mean that GT from the beginning was simply a method and could be used by all researchers, no matter which tradition they belong to or which theoretical approach they pursue. Or as Charmaz put it: '...researchers starting from other vantage points - feminist, Marxist, phenomenologist - can use grounded theory strategies for their empirical studies.' (Charmaz 2000: 511) The negation of the question would imply that Charmaz's constructivist approach cannot claim the term Grounded Theory for itself. The following paper will examine this question in greater detail in order to find a tentative answer. Starting with a short description of the development, procedures and epistemological foundations of GT , the second part will focus on Charmaz's arguments brought forward against the variant of Strauss and her constructivist version of GT. At the end of this section, her propsals will be evaluated in terms of innovation. In a third section her arguments against Strauss & Corbin will be examined regarding their warrant and validity. Finally, the conclusion will draw together all arguments to solve the question about the exchangeability of the epistemological fundament of GT.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2007 in the subject Sociology - Methodology and Methods, grade: 1,3, University of Tubingen, language: English, abstract: I.Introduction Since the first publication of Grounded Theory (in the following GT) by Anselm L. Strauss and Barney Glaser in 1967, a lot of scientists and researchers have written about, applied and reformulated this theory-building method. What is lacking in many of these works is GT's acknowledgement as a methodology. Many researchers have applied the procedures proposed by Strauss and Glaser, but they do not seem to be aware of the epistemological implications resulting from the use of the GT method. As Strauss together with his co-author Juliet Corbin stated: 'In this book (Basics of Qualitative Research, BD/CL), we are offering more than a set of procedures. We are offering a way of thinking about and of viewing the world that can enrich the research of those who choose to use this methodology.' (Strauss/ Corbin 1998: 4) Kathy Charmaz appears to be an exception in this canon, since she is not only thinking about the philosophy of knowledge behind GT, but also attempting to renew the epistemological groundings of GT in the field of constructivism. This leads us to the main question of this thesis: Is this possible? Can the GT method be abstracted from the epistemology standing behind it and be founded on a new one? An affirmative answer would mean that GT from the beginning was simply a method and could be used by all researchers, no matter which tradition they belong to or which theoretical approach they pursue. Or as Charmaz put it: '...researchers starting from other vantage points - feminist, Marxist, phenomenologist - can use grounded theory strategies for their empirical studies.' (Charmaz 2000: 511) The negation of the question would imply that Charmaz's constructivist approach cannot claim the term Grounded Theory for itself. The following paper will examine this question in greater detail in order to find a tentative answer. Starting with a short description of the development, procedures and epistemological foundations of GT , the second part will focus on Charmaz's arguments brought forward against the variant of Strauss and her constructivist version of GT. At the end of this section, her propsals will be evaluated in terms of innovation. In a third section her arguments against Strauss & Corbin will be examined regarding their warrant and validity. Finally, the conclusion will draw together all arguments to solve the question about the exchangeability of the epistemological fundament of GT.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book US foreign policy towards the Russian Federation: The constrained Empire by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Alterity and History in Micheal Ondaatje's 'The English Patient' by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Cabaret Songs by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Limitations of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Legal aspects of marketing and eventmanagement by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Sisters from the same mother and different fathers? A geographic and economic analysis of two cities with equal premises but different development by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Placement Report: Website Design, Data Import and Support by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book The promotion of small and medium-sized enterprises in the EU by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Simulation and mirror neurons. Evidence in humans and monkeys by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Elucidation of Annuitisation Anomalies via Financial Behaviour by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Integration or Separation? by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book The Different Ways of Describing Meaning in Monolingual Dictionaries by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Is 'The Jungle' by Upton Sinnclair really a city novel? by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Global Transcriptional Responses of Fission Yeast to Glucose Starvation Stress by Anna-Maria Damalis
Cover of the book Hemingway: The Killers. An Interpretation by Anna-Maria Damalis
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy