Entick v Carrington

250 Years of the Rule of Law

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Constitutional
Cover of the book Entick v Carrington by , Bloomsbury Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9781509901944
Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Publication: September 24, 2015
Imprint: Hart Publishing Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9781509901944
Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing
Publication: September 24, 2015
Imprint: Hart Publishing
Language: English

Entick v Carrington is one of the canons of English public law and in 2015 it is 250 years old. In 1762 the Earl of Halifax, one of His Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State, despatched Nathan Carrington and three other of the King's messengers to John Entick's house in Stepney. They broke into his house, seizing his papers and causing significant damage. Why? Because he was said to have written seditious papers published in the Monitor. Entick sued Carrington and the other messengers for trespass. The defendants argued that the Earl of Halifax had given them legal authority to act as they had. Lord Camden ruled firmly in Entick's favour, holding that the warrant of a Secretary of State could not render lawful actions such as these which were otherwise unlawful.
The case is a canonical statement of the common law's commitment to the constitutional principle of the rule of law. In this collection, leading public lawyers reflect on the history of the case, the enduring importance of the legal principles for which it stands, and the broader implications of Entick v Carrington 250 years on.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Entick v Carrington is one of the canons of English public law and in 2015 it is 250 years old. In 1762 the Earl of Halifax, one of His Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State, despatched Nathan Carrington and three other of the King's messengers to John Entick's house in Stepney. They broke into his house, seizing his papers and causing significant damage. Why? Because he was said to have written seditious papers published in the Monitor. Entick sued Carrington and the other messengers for trespass. The defendants argued that the Earl of Halifax had given them legal authority to act as they had. Lord Camden ruled firmly in Entick's favour, holding that the warrant of a Secretary of State could not render lawful actions such as these which were otherwise unlawful.
The case is a canonical statement of the common law's commitment to the constitutional principle of the rule of law. In this collection, leading public lawyers reflect on the history of the case, the enduring importance of the legal principles for which it stands, and the broader implications of Entick v Carrington 250 years on.

More books from Bloomsbury Publishing

Cover of the book M4 (76mm) Sherman Medium Tank 1943–65 by
Cover of the book History of Technology Volume 11 by
Cover of the book Litigating Trust Disputes in Jersey by
Cover of the book Train Your Gaze by
Cover of the book An Anthropology of Architecture by
Cover of the book Olympiodorus: On Plato First Alcibiades 10–28 by
Cover of the book US World War II Parachute Infantry Regiments by
Cover of the book The Canon Law of the Roman Catholic Church and the Church of England 2nd edition by
Cover of the book Modern Records, Maverick Methods by
Cover of the book Fw 190 Defence of the Reich Aces by
Cover of the book Applied Theatre: Economies by
Cover of the book Culinary Art and Anthropology by
Cover of the book Tirpitz in Norway by
Cover of the book Wilpon's Folly by
Cover of the book History of Technology Volume 26 by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy