From a Rational Point of View

How We Represent Subjective Perspectives in Practical Discourse

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Ethics & Moral Philosophy, Reference & Language, Language Arts
Cover of the book From a Rational Point of View by Tim Henning, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Tim Henning ISBN: 9780192517432
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: May 11, 2018
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Tim Henning
ISBN: 9780192517432
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: May 11, 2018
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

When discussing normative reasons, oughts, requirements of rationality, motivating reasons, and so on, we often have to use verbs like "believe" and "want" to capture a relevant subject's perspective. According to the received view about sentences involving these verbs, what they do is describe the subject's mental states. Many puzzles concerning normative discourse have to do with the role that mental states consequently appear to play in normative discourse. Tim Henning uses tools from semantics and the philosophy of language to develop an alternative account of sentences involving these verbs. According to this view, which is called parentheticalism, we very commonly use these verbs in a parenthetical sense. These verbs themselves express backgrounded side-remarks on the contents they embed, and these latter, embedded contents constitute the at-issue contents. This means that instead of speaking about the subject's mental states, we often use sentences involving "believe" and "want" to speak about the world from her point of view. Henning makes this notion precise, and uses it to solve various puzzles concerning normative discourse. The final result is a new, unified understanding of normative discourse, which gets by without postulating conceptual breaks between objective and subjective normative reasons, or normative reasons and rationality, or indeed between the reasons we ascribe to an agent and the reasons she herself can be expected to cite. Instead of being connected to either subjective mental states or objective facts, all of these normative statuses are can be adequately articulated by citing worldly considerations from a subject's point of view.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

When discussing normative reasons, oughts, requirements of rationality, motivating reasons, and so on, we often have to use verbs like "believe" and "want" to capture a relevant subject's perspective. According to the received view about sentences involving these verbs, what they do is describe the subject's mental states. Many puzzles concerning normative discourse have to do with the role that mental states consequently appear to play in normative discourse. Tim Henning uses tools from semantics and the philosophy of language to develop an alternative account of sentences involving these verbs. According to this view, which is called parentheticalism, we very commonly use these verbs in a parenthetical sense. These verbs themselves express backgrounded side-remarks on the contents they embed, and these latter, embedded contents constitute the at-issue contents. This means that instead of speaking about the subject's mental states, we often use sentences involving "believe" and "want" to speak about the world from her point of view. Henning makes this notion precise, and uses it to solve various puzzles concerning normative discourse. The final result is a new, unified understanding of normative discourse, which gets by without postulating conceptual breaks between objective and subjective normative reasons, or normative reasons and rationality, or indeed between the reasons we ascribe to an agent and the reasons she herself can be expected to cite. Instead of being connected to either subjective mental states or objective facts, all of these normative statuses are can be adequately articulated by citing worldly considerations from a subject's point of view.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Volume 3 by Tim Henning
Cover of the book How Big is Big and How Small is Small by Tim Henning
Cover of the book Cognitive Science and the New Testament by Tim Henning
Cover of the book Cryptocurrencies in Public and Private Law by Tim Henning
Cover of the book Alzheimer's and other Dementias by Tim Henning
Cover of the book Telling & Duxbury's Planning Law and Procedure by Tim Henning
Cover of the book The Bermuda Form by Tim Henning
Cover of the book Wordsmiths and Warriors by Tim Henning
Cover of the book What Truth Is by Tim Henning
Cover of the book The Epistemic Life of Groups by Tim Henning
Cover of the book Democracy and Political Culture by Tim Henning
Cover of the book How to get a Specialty Training post by Tim Henning
Cover of the book The Robust Demands of the Good by Tim Henning
Cover of the book Musical Concerns by Tim Henning
Cover of the book Oxford Desk Reference: Cardiology by Tim Henning
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy