Morality and Rational Choice

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Ethics & Moral Philosophy
Cover of the book Morality and Rational Choice by J. Baron, Springer Netherlands
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: J. Baron ISBN: 9789401582261
Publisher: Springer Netherlands Publication: December 6, 2012
Imprint: Springer Language: English
Author: J. Baron
ISBN: 9789401582261
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Publication: December 6, 2012
Imprint: Springer
Language: English

Public controversies - such as those about the distribution of goods between rich and poor, trade and population policies, allocation of medical resources, and the tradeoff between environment al protection and economic efficiency - often hinge on fundamental views about how we ought to make decisions tImt affect each other, that is, what principles we ought to follow. Efforts to find an acceptable public philosophy, a set of such principles on which people might agree, have foundered because of dis agreement among philosophers and others who are concerned with such issues. One view, which I shall develop and defend here, holds that decisions that affect others should be made according to an overall evaluation of the consequences of each option. This consequentialist view is opposed by a variety of alternatives, but many of the alternatives have in COlllmon a basis in moral intuition. To take a simple example, consequentialism holds that, other things equal, if we have decided that it is better to let a terminally ill patient die than to prolong her agony by keeping her alive, then we ought to kill her.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Public controversies - such as those about the distribution of goods between rich and poor, trade and population policies, allocation of medical resources, and the tradeoff between environment al protection and economic efficiency - often hinge on fundamental views about how we ought to make decisions tImt affect each other, that is, what principles we ought to follow. Efforts to find an acceptable public philosophy, a set of such principles on which people might agree, have foundered because of dis agreement among philosophers and others who are concerned with such issues. One view, which I shall develop and defend here, holds that decisions that affect others should be made according to an overall evaluation of the consequences of each option. This consequentialist view is opposed by a variety of alternatives, but many of the alternatives have in COlllmon a basis in moral intuition. To take a simple example, consequentialism holds that, other things equal, if we have decided that it is better to let a terminally ill patient die than to prolong her agony by keeping her alive, then we ought to kill her.

More books from Springer Netherlands

Cover of the book Butterfly Conservation in North America by J. Baron
Cover of the book Ophthalmic Tumours by J. Baron
Cover of the book Research in Science Education in Europe by J. Baron
Cover of the book Community Quality-of-Life Indicators: Best Cases V by J. Baron
Cover of the book Phenomenology: East and West by J. Baron
Cover of the book Hume and Husserl by J. Baron
Cover of the book International Handbook of Educational Evaluation by J. Baron
Cover of the book Sampling Procedures to Detect Mycotoxins in Agricultural Commodities by J. Baron
Cover of the book Physical Models of Semiconductor Quantum Devices by J. Baron
Cover of the book Animal Models by J. Baron
Cover of the book Introduction to International Law by J. Baron
Cover of the book Healthy Ties by J. Baron
Cover of the book Chemical Cosmology by J. Baron
Cover of the book Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects by J. Baron
Cover of the book Production of Hydrogen from Renewable Resources by J. Baron
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy