Principal-Agency-Theory in Mergers and Acquisitions

Business & Finance, Accounting, Financial
Cover of the book Principal-Agency-Theory in Mergers and Acquisitions by Tobias Marsch, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Tobias Marsch ISBN: 9783668009615
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: July 1, 2015
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Tobias Marsch
ISBN: 9783668009615
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: July 1, 2015
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2015 in the subject Business economics - Controlling, grade: 2,0, , language: English, abstract: In times of globalization and increasing competition there are a lot of new big challenges for companies and their chief executive officers (CEO). High cost pressure, new competitors and the desire for a growing shareholder value are the challenges of global competitiveness. After exhausting all opportunities of internal optimization potentials the only way for many companies to grow or to ensure survival is to merge with other companies. The CEOs of the companies try to manage the growing requirements by extending the business portfolios or even acquiring whole companies. So in 2013 in Germany the number of Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) was the highest for five years. A study of the Boston Consulting Group says that from 1988 to 2010 more than 26.000 transactions were realized. This figure confirms the high importance of that method. But are M&A the panpharmacon to handle the changing global markets and to ensure the prospective success of the companies? If you have a detailed look at the results you can recognize that a large number of executed M&A did not satisfy the expectations or even destroy value. The risks are all too frequent just underestimated. Often the failure is due to information asymmetry of the acting partners. This effect is called the principal-agency-problem. What is the reason for that and why do so many M&A fail? What are the real goals of the participants of such an M&A-process? Do all participants pursue the same objectives or are there maybe any other intentions in the case? The following assignment deals with the M&A-process in relation to the principal-agency-theory and shows some solution approaches to avoid bad surprises for all participating companies after an executed M&A-process.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2015 in the subject Business economics - Controlling, grade: 2,0, , language: English, abstract: In times of globalization and increasing competition there are a lot of new big challenges for companies and their chief executive officers (CEO). High cost pressure, new competitors and the desire for a growing shareholder value are the challenges of global competitiveness. After exhausting all opportunities of internal optimization potentials the only way for many companies to grow or to ensure survival is to merge with other companies. The CEOs of the companies try to manage the growing requirements by extending the business portfolios or even acquiring whole companies. So in 2013 in Germany the number of Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) was the highest for five years. A study of the Boston Consulting Group says that from 1988 to 2010 more than 26.000 transactions were realized. This figure confirms the high importance of that method. But are M&A the panpharmacon to handle the changing global markets and to ensure the prospective success of the companies? If you have a detailed look at the results you can recognize that a large number of executed M&A did not satisfy the expectations or even destroy value. The risks are all too frequent just underestimated. Often the failure is due to information asymmetry of the acting partners. This effect is called the principal-agency-problem. What is the reason for that and why do so many M&A fail? What are the real goals of the participants of such an M&A-process? Do all participants pursue the same objectives or are there maybe any other intentions in the case? The following assignment deals with the M&A-process in relation to the principal-agency-theory and shows some solution approaches to avoid bad surprises for all participating companies after an executed M&A-process.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Weblogs als neues Kommunikationsmedium in der Bildungswissenschaft by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Sabotage - Beastie Boys: Ein Versuch zur Theorie des Remakes by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Rollstuhlbasketball macht Schule (Unterrichtsstunde Klasse 6) by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Schöpfung und Naturwissenschaft im Konflikt by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Planungsinstrumente in der TGA und Bauphysik by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Freizeit und Subkulturen: Ein Überblick by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Mit Sprache über Sprache - Gegenüberstellung und Rezeption der (Sprach-)Philosophie von Platon und Aristoteles by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Kunst und Literatur in der Abolitionsbewegung und das Ende des britischen Sklavenhandels by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Portfolio Management. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der verschiedenen Methoden by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Der polizeiliche Schusswaffengebrauch als Notwehrmaßnahme im Rechtsvergleich des Bundesrechts und des Landesrechts Bayerns by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Die Politik der Europäischen Zentralbank by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Zur Theorie und Praxis tiergestützter Interventionen mit Hunden by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Beratung in der Schule - Definition und Aufgaben by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Psychische Traumatisierung am Beispiel sexualisierter Gewalterfahrungen in der Kindheit. by Tobias Marsch
Cover of the book Stress im Zusammenhang mit kleinen Handlungsspielräumen by Tobias Marsch
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy