Rather Something - On 'nothing' in King Lear

On 'nothing' in King Lear

Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, British
Cover of the book Rather Something - On 'nothing' in King Lear by Stefanie Klering, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Stefanie Klering ISBN: 9783638821667
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: July 8, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Stefanie Klering
ISBN: 9783638821667
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: July 8, 2007
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Literature, grade: 1,0, University of Heidelberg (Anglistisches Seminar), course: Shakespeare and the human evil , 18 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In Elizabethan English there was no figure standing for 'nothing'. But through the influence of Indian philosophy and mathematical concepts the sign '0' was established in Europe. This introduction had a strong impact - not only in mathematics. The idea assigned to it brought strong dispute with it. Especially in philosophy a lot of questions were being asked: What was the nature of 'nothing'?, Was 'nothing' really nothing?, Could one talk about 'nothing'? Didn't it become something thereby? etc. Questions like these appeared during the Nihilist movement in the 16th century, which eventually led to Nietzsche's statement 'God is dead'. Shakespeare used the term 'nothing' about forty times in different contexts within his tragedy King Lear. However, in most student guides and source books on King Lear, 'nothing' is not regarded as leitmotive. As Brian ROTMAN points out, William Shakespeare was 'in the first generation of children in England to have learned about zero from Robert Recorde's Arithmetic.' In addition to his frequent use of 'nothing', Shakespeare lets two of his main characters deal with the aspect of 'nothing': the play dramatizes '[...] reductions to nothing, charting the annihilation of human warmth, the dissolution of social, natural, familial bonds, the emptying of kindness, sympathy, tenderness, love, pity, affection into hollow shells, into substitutes for themselves[...].' The main thesis of this essay is based on the mathematical concept of 'nothing' in which zero is the narrow borderline between positive and negative. Hence, Edgar can not be right when stating 'Edgar I nothing am.' Although in most secondary sources relevant for King Lear Gloucester usually is regarded as Lear's counterpart in the subplot, the focus in this essay will be put on the comparison of King Lear and Edgar and their individual development throughout the play. In order to proof this thesis, the concept of nothing and its sources will be introduced and explained. Chapter I will give a short overview of the ideas of the mathematical concept of 'nothing'. It will explain where the idea of a thing as 'nothing' comes from, how and when it became known in Europe and especially in Elizabethan England and why the sign '0' was chosen. Chapter II transfers the concept to the play. Although in Shakespearean times mathematics and literature are often regarded as diametral sciences, mathematics are relevant in deed for the reading of Shakespeare's King Lear. The hints on mathematics within the text will be examined in detail.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2006 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Literature, grade: 1,0, University of Heidelberg (Anglistisches Seminar), course: Shakespeare and the human evil , 18 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In Elizabethan English there was no figure standing for 'nothing'. But through the influence of Indian philosophy and mathematical concepts the sign '0' was established in Europe. This introduction had a strong impact - not only in mathematics. The idea assigned to it brought strong dispute with it. Especially in philosophy a lot of questions were being asked: What was the nature of 'nothing'?, Was 'nothing' really nothing?, Could one talk about 'nothing'? Didn't it become something thereby? etc. Questions like these appeared during the Nihilist movement in the 16th century, which eventually led to Nietzsche's statement 'God is dead'. Shakespeare used the term 'nothing' about forty times in different contexts within his tragedy King Lear. However, in most student guides and source books on King Lear, 'nothing' is not regarded as leitmotive. As Brian ROTMAN points out, William Shakespeare was 'in the first generation of children in England to have learned about zero from Robert Recorde's Arithmetic.' In addition to his frequent use of 'nothing', Shakespeare lets two of his main characters deal with the aspect of 'nothing': the play dramatizes '[...] reductions to nothing, charting the annihilation of human warmth, the dissolution of social, natural, familial bonds, the emptying of kindness, sympathy, tenderness, love, pity, affection into hollow shells, into substitutes for themselves[...].' The main thesis of this essay is based on the mathematical concept of 'nothing' in which zero is the narrow borderline between positive and negative. Hence, Edgar can not be right when stating 'Edgar I nothing am.' Although in most secondary sources relevant for King Lear Gloucester usually is regarded as Lear's counterpart in the subplot, the focus in this essay will be put on the comparison of King Lear and Edgar and their individual development throughout the play. In order to proof this thesis, the concept of nothing and its sources will be introduced and explained. Chapter I will give a short overview of the ideas of the mathematical concept of 'nothing'. It will explain where the idea of a thing as 'nothing' comes from, how and when it became known in Europe and especially in Elizabethan England and why the sign '0' was chosen. Chapter II transfers the concept to the play. Although in Shakespearean times mathematics and literature are often regarded as diametral sciences, mathematics are relevant in deed for the reading of Shakespeare's King Lear. The hints on mathematics within the text will be examined in detail.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book The Growth of 'Innocent Drink Ltd.' by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God: Marriage in Zora Neale Hurston's 'Their Eyes Were Watching God' by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book How America's Allies Perceive U.S. Primacy - A Neorealistic Approach with Focus on the Latest Iraq War by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book The Voice of the Narrator in J.R.R. Tolkien's The Hobbit by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book A City's Phenomenon - From Impersonality to Loneliness, and the Struggle for Emotional Satisfaction. Characteristics of a Metropolis such as New York. by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book Zara: An analysis of market-orientated supply chain management in the retail fashion industry by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book The Persian Gulf War and its aftermath by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book Interpretation of Walker Evans´photograph from 'Let Us Now Praise Famous Men' and Gertrude Stein´s portrait of Picasso by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book The System of Wage-Setting Japan, Germany and the US: Towards Convergence? by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book The Freirean Approach to Adult literacy Education by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book Using Covariance Matrices as Feature Descriptors for Vehicle Detection from a Fixed Camera by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book Taiwan - Economic trends and trade development by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book Mergers & Acquisitions: A comparison of the perspectives for shareholders and management by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book The Social Darwinism Ideals of William Graham Sumner (1840-1910) and the Progressive Principles of Jane Addams (1860-1935) by Stefanie Klering
Cover of the book Die politische Ökonomie der russischen Wirtschaftspolitik in der Jelzin-Ära: State-Capture durch die 'Oligarchen'? by Stefanie Klering
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy