Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate'

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory
Cover of the book Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate' by Ralph Myers, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Ralph Myers ISBN: 9783640756001
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: November 19, 2010
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Ralph Myers
ISBN: 9783640756001
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: November 19, 2010
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Scientific Essay from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 90%, Dublin City University, course: International Relations, language: English, abstract: Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate': a Positivist versus Post-Positivist Approach According to Yosef Lapid (1989: 236), International Relations, by the end of the 1980's was 'in the midst of a third discipline-defining debate', between positivism and post-positivism. Scholars studying the phenomenon of civil war and its causes seem to have been largely exempt from this debate. There are two discernible reasons for this. First, the study of civil war has long been marginalized by the dominant theoretical paradigm of Realism within security studies, which does not concern itself with war, within the intrastate system. This is surprising, since from the start of the millennium, intrastate conflict has been far more prevalent than interstate conflict. Second, within the academic field of civil war onset, which this paper focuses on specifically, the theoretical approach is primarily positivist. Most literature on the subject of civil war, focuses around the so called 'greed-grievance debate, and though the latter does usually focus on identity, it remains essentially positivist. This however, does not mean that the 'Third Debate' does not apply to the academic field of civil war onset as this paper will show. This paper analyses two journal articles, one positivist: Greed and Grievance in Civil War (2004) by Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, and one post-positivist: The Construction of Grievance: Natural Resources and Identity in a Separatist Conflict (2007) by Edward Aspinall. Using these articles, this paper will compare and evaluate their research approaches, their worth and effectiveness in addressing the subject and research question and their contribution to knowledge. Finally this paper will give some recommendations as to future areas of inquiry.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Scientific Essay from the year 2010 in the subject Politics - Political Theory and the History of Ideas Journal, grade: 90%, Dublin City University, course: International Relations, language: English, abstract: Civil War Onset and the 'Third Debate': a Positivist versus Post-Positivist Approach According to Yosef Lapid (1989: 236), International Relations, by the end of the 1980's was 'in the midst of a third discipline-defining debate', between positivism and post-positivism. Scholars studying the phenomenon of civil war and its causes seem to have been largely exempt from this debate. There are two discernible reasons for this. First, the study of civil war has long been marginalized by the dominant theoretical paradigm of Realism within security studies, which does not concern itself with war, within the intrastate system. This is surprising, since from the start of the millennium, intrastate conflict has been far more prevalent than interstate conflict. Second, within the academic field of civil war onset, which this paper focuses on specifically, the theoretical approach is primarily positivist. Most literature on the subject of civil war, focuses around the so called 'greed-grievance debate, and though the latter does usually focus on identity, it remains essentially positivist. This however, does not mean that the 'Third Debate' does not apply to the academic field of civil war onset as this paper will show. This paper analyses two journal articles, one positivist: Greed and Grievance in Civil War (2004) by Paul Collier and Anke Hoeffler, and one post-positivist: The Construction of Grievance: Natural Resources and Identity in a Separatist Conflict (2007) by Edward Aspinall. Using these articles, this paper will compare and evaluate their research approaches, their worth and effectiveness in addressing the subject and research question and their contribution to knowledge. Finally this paper will give some recommendations as to future areas of inquiry.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Aspects and implementation of effective quality management systems by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book Logic and Propositions by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book Coming of Age: Hawaiian Culture in Kirby Wright's Fiction by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book Dr. Robert Waller: Visionary Leader and Skilled Manager by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book A Comparative Analysis of Internal and External Credit Ratings by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book Germany - a truly united country? by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book Why is the Present Perfect such a problematic tense? by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book Zadie Smith's White Teeth: Identity Construction between Historical Roots and Transcultural Hybridity by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book Perspectives on the Decline of Partisanship in the United States by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book The oversight of the audit profession by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book Mr. Knightley and Jane Austen's concept of the gentleman ideal by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book Pharmacotherapeutics by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book Joseph Smith and the United States Presidency by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book Akzo Nobel - A European Integration perspective by Ralph Myers
Cover of the book The Role of Animals in McCarthy's 'Blood Meridian' and Haggard's 'She' by Ralph Myers
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy