Llewellyn's law job theory and the challenge of the current ban on prisoners' voting. Should prisoners in the United Kingdom be granted the right to vote?

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Criminal Procedure
Cover of the book Llewellyn's law job theory and the challenge of the current ban on prisoners' voting. Should prisoners in the United Kingdom be granted the right to vote? by M. T., GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: M. T. ISBN: 9783656986164
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: July 28, 2016
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: M. T.
ISBN: 9783656986164
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: July 28, 2016
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Essay from the year 2016 in the subject Law - Criminal process, Criminology, Law Enforcement, grade: 68%, 11 Punkte, , language: English, abstract: The aim of this essay is to work out and comment upon the treatment of prisoner voting rights by different instruments and the respective authorities on the basis of the parliamentary briefing paper dated from 11 February 2015 with particular consideration of the implementation of Llewellyn's law jobs. First, this essay will present Llewellyn's law job theory, then it will outline general provisions relating to voting rights. In the next section, the ECtHR's and the UK government's point of view on this debate will be critically examined, followed by an evaluation referring to the operation of the law jobs, especially emphasizing tensions regarding the resolution of trouble cases and the guiding of people's conduct. Should prisoners in the United Kingdom be granted the right to vote? Several cases - Hirst v The United Kingdom (No 2) probably being the most popular example, where the convicted sought to challenge the current ban on prisoners' voting - raised this issue in the recent years. A highly controversial debate was thereby initiated, especially against the backdrop of frequently arising tensions between the UK and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as to the nature and extent of how some substantive rights operate. Since the Human Rights Act 1998 incorporates the rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into the law of the UK, the national courts are generally obliged to interpret national law in a manner compatible with the ECHR and to consider the decisions of the ECtHR .

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2016 in the subject Law - Criminal process, Criminology, Law Enforcement, grade: 68%, 11 Punkte, , language: English, abstract: The aim of this essay is to work out and comment upon the treatment of prisoner voting rights by different instruments and the respective authorities on the basis of the parliamentary briefing paper dated from 11 February 2015 with particular consideration of the implementation of Llewellyn's law jobs. First, this essay will present Llewellyn's law job theory, then it will outline general provisions relating to voting rights. In the next section, the ECtHR's and the UK government's point of view on this debate will be critically examined, followed by an evaluation referring to the operation of the law jobs, especially emphasizing tensions regarding the resolution of trouble cases and the guiding of people's conduct. Should prisoners in the United Kingdom be granted the right to vote? Several cases - Hirst v The United Kingdom (No 2) probably being the most popular example, where the convicted sought to challenge the current ban on prisoners' voting - raised this issue in the recent years. A highly controversial debate was thereby initiated, especially against the backdrop of frequently arising tensions between the UK and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as to the nature and extent of how some substantive rights operate. Since the Human Rights Act 1998 incorporates the rights contained in the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) into the law of the UK, the national courts are generally obliged to interpret national law in a manner compatible with the ECHR and to consider the decisions of the ECtHR .

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Vor- und Nachteile von Franchising aus der Sicht des Franchise-Nehmers am Beispiel von McDonald's by M. T.
Cover of the book Immaterialgüterrechte und Objektreplikation. Juristische Risiken und Lösungsmöglichkeiten bei der Vermarktung von 3D-Druckvorlagen by M. T.
Cover of the book Das Freizeit- und Computerverhalten von Hauptschülern und Gymnasiasten im Vergleich - Ergebnisse einer explorativen Studie und Konsequenzen für die schulische Medienerziehung by M. T.
Cover of the book Die Diskussion um die neuen KMU-IFRS - Chancen und Risiken für den deutschen Mittelstand aus bilanzpolitischer Sicht by M. T.
Cover of the book Die Rolle der mexikanischen Maquiladoras innerhalb der NAFTA und der Weltwirtschaft by M. T.
Cover of the book Produktiver Umgang mit Kinder- und Jugendliteratur by M. T.
Cover of the book Räume privater Lebensführung und die Rolle der 'alten' Wertvermittlungsinstanzen by M. T.
Cover of the book Kinderzeichnungen in der Kunstpädagogik by M. T.
Cover of the book Ein Zufallsexperiment mit zwei Würfeln - Bestimmung der Häufigkeitsverteilung der Augensumme zweier Würfel by M. T.
Cover of the book Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung by M. T.
Cover of the book Der Sturz des Walter Ulbricht by M. T.
Cover of the book Einsatz von Mikroexpressionserkennungssoftware in Apps zur Entwicklungsförderung emotionaler Intelligenz bei Kindern mit Autismus-Spektrums-Störung by M. T.
Cover of the book Die Soziale Phobie by M. T.
Cover of the book Die Urbanisierung der Textilindustriestädte Barmen und Elberfeld by M. T.
Cover of the book Wachstumsfinanzierung mit Hilfe eines Börsengangs by M. T.
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy