The Critical Period Hypothesis supported by Genie's case

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book The Critical Period Hypothesis supported by Genie's case by Anne Fuchs, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Anne Fuchs ISBN: 9783638355407
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: March 6, 2005
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Anne Fuchs
ISBN: 9783638355407
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: March 6, 2005
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2002 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,3, Ruhr-University of Bochum, 9 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In 1967 Eric Heinz Lenneberg established his groundbreaking work 'Biological Foundations of Language' in which he tries to push the biological view on language forward. One important point that is discussed is 'language in the context of growth and maturation'. The Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH) is the essence of this considerations. Lenneberg tries to find evidence for his theory in the study of retarded, aphasic or deaf children and in neurological studies. But at this time the most striking proof for the CPH, Genie, was still imprisoned in a small room in her parents home. Three years after Lenneberg published his work on the CPH, 13½ years-old Genie was recovered by an eligibility worker and her case rapidly aroused the interest of neurologists, psychologists and linguists. Susan Curtiss, a graduate student of the UCLA Linguistic Department got the possibility to work with Genie for the years to come. Her work Genie - A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern-Day 'Wild Child' compiles her experiences on working with Genie added by a detailed case history. What Susan Curtiss found out about Genie's linguistic development seems to be the evidence for the existence of a critical phase for first language acquisition. This paper gives a brief definition of Lenneberg's Critical Period Hypothesis, summarizes the case history and the data of Genie's linguistic development and, according to Susan Curtiss, relates Genie's case directly to the CPH. Over and above that, it tries to explain, why Genie developed a certain amount of language and with this proved the 'strong' version of Lenneberg's hypothesis as wrong.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2002 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 1,3, Ruhr-University of Bochum, 9 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: In 1967 Eric Heinz Lenneberg established his groundbreaking work 'Biological Foundations of Language' in which he tries to push the biological view on language forward. One important point that is discussed is 'language in the context of growth and maturation'. The Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH) is the essence of this considerations. Lenneberg tries to find evidence for his theory in the study of retarded, aphasic or deaf children and in neurological studies. But at this time the most striking proof for the CPH, Genie, was still imprisoned in a small room in her parents home. Three years after Lenneberg published his work on the CPH, 13½ years-old Genie was recovered by an eligibility worker and her case rapidly aroused the interest of neurologists, psychologists and linguists. Susan Curtiss, a graduate student of the UCLA Linguistic Department got the possibility to work with Genie for the years to come. Her work Genie - A Psycholinguistic Study of a Modern-Day 'Wild Child' compiles her experiences on working with Genie added by a detailed case history. What Susan Curtiss found out about Genie's linguistic development seems to be the evidence for the existence of a critical phase for first language acquisition. This paper gives a brief definition of Lenneberg's Critical Period Hypothesis, summarizes the case history and the data of Genie's linguistic development and, according to Susan Curtiss, relates Genie's case directly to the CPH. Over and above that, it tries to explain, why Genie developed a certain amount of language and with this proved the 'strong' version of Lenneberg's hypothesis as wrong.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Warum der Londonder Universalfriedensvertrag von 1518 scheiterte by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Der Erlebnisorientierte Ansatz - Naturerleben im Biologieunterricht by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Der systemdynamische Ansatz. Differntielles Lernen im Fußball. by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Wandel der Lebensformen - geschlechterdifferenzierende Rollenverteilung by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book How does the 'Bad Bank' Concept Influence the Commercial Banks' Ability and Willingness to Increase Commercial Lending in Germany by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Google: Einfluss und Auswirkungen der Suchmaschine auf Individual- und gesellschaftliche Kommunikation by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Synästhetische Beziehung zwischen auditiven und visuellen Elementen by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book The World's Most Popular Cruise Line by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Theoretische Grundlagen der Erstellung einer Marketingkonzeption by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Der Kolumbus-Kult in Spanien by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Intuitive Entscheidungsfindung - Ist der Homo Oeconomicus noch zu retten? by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Die deutsche Rückwanderung aus Amerika im 19. Jahrhundert by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Urteilsanalyse zur Entscheidung BGH ? VIII ZR 220/10 by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Das Über-Ich bei Sigmund Freud by Anne Fuchs
Cover of the book Psychische Erkrankungen und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Partnerschaft by Anne Fuchs
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy