An investigation of the relationship between value chain activities and generic strategies in small and medium-sized enterprises in UK Manufacturing

Business & Finance, Management & Leadership, Management
Cover of the book An investigation of the relationship between value chain activities and generic strategies in small and medium-sized enterprises in UK Manufacturing by Antonios Michail, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Antonios Michail ISBN: 9783656085300
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: December 19, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Antonios Michail
ISBN: 9783656085300
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: December 19, 2011
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Doctoral Thesis / Dissertation from the year 2011 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, University of Central Lancashire, language: English, abstract: In this study an in depth investigation of successful competitive strategies for small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is undertaken. The overall aim of this study is to analyse the strategic orientation of UK Manufacturing SMEs. In the process, it will test Porter's (1980, 1985) theoretical framework of generic strategies and thus evaluate firms' preferred strategic synthesis. It will, therefore, test the efficacy of the value chain and develop any specific pattern that relates to a combination strategy. The investigation of the above objectives is undertaken utilising a mixed research methodology with the purpose of examining the applicability of existing competitive strategy frameworks (phase 1) and testing a new theoretical framework that incorporates additional dimensions of strategy (phase 2). During phase 1, Porter's framework is employed to investigate SMEs' strategic orientation as a means to achieve sustainable competitive advantage. A semi-structured questionnaire is employed and the analysis is carried out by means of factor and cluster analysis to identify strategic variables currently employed by SMEs. During phase 2, the theoretical framework is operationalised to bridge the gap within the literature and existing empirical research. Its purpose is to identify forms of successful competitive strategies of UK MSMEs as they are formulated and implemented in firms' value chain activities. The data was collected through a number of semi-structured interviews and the analysis was based on data categorisation. The findings indicate that Porter's (1980) single generic strategies are not the best option for UK MSMEs for gaining competitive advantage and that the competitive strategy of successful MSMEs differs from that of the less successful ones. Successful UK MSMEs develop competitive strategies that are characterised by a combination of strategies as they are formulated within firms' value chain activities. Although, during the evaluation of strategic synthesis at value chain level, the data analysis demonstrated that not all forms of combination strategies can deliver a high performance. One of the significant findings to emerge from this study is that the value chain framework is essential when analysing forms of successful competitive strategies of UK MSMEs. The results of this investigation also show that generalisations and previous recommendations regarding successful MSMEs competitive strategy should be interpreted with caution.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Doctoral Thesis / Dissertation from the year 2011 in the subject Business economics - Business Management, Corporate Governance, University of Central Lancashire, language: English, abstract: In this study an in depth investigation of successful competitive strategies for small to medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is undertaken. The overall aim of this study is to analyse the strategic orientation of UK Manufacturing SMEs. In the process, it will test Porter's (1980, 1985) theoretical framework of generic strategies and thus evaluate firms' preferred strategic synthesis. It will, therefore, test the efficacy of the value chain and develop any specific pattern that relates to a combination strategy. The investigation of the above objectives is undertaken utilising a mixed research methodology with the purpose of examining the applicability of existing competitive strategy frameworks (phase 1) and testing a new theoretical framework that incorporates additional dimensions of strategy (phase 2). During phase 1, Porter's framework is employed to investigate SMEs' strategic orientation as a means to achieve sustainable competitive advantage. A semi-structured questionnaire is employed and the analysis is carried out by means of factor and cluster analysis to identify strategic variables currently employed by SMEs. During phase 2, the theoretical framework is operationalised to bridge the gap within the literature and existing empirical research. Its purpose is to identify forms of successful competitive strategies of UK MSMEs as they are formulated and implemented in firms' value chain activities. The data was collected through a number of semi-structured interviews and the analysis was based on data categorisation. The findings indicate that Porter's (1980) single generic strategies are not the best option for UK MSMEs for gaining competitive advantage and that the competitive strategy of successful MSMEs differs from that of the less successful ones. Successful UK MSMEs develop competitive strategies that are characterised by a combination of strategies as they are formulated within firms' value chain activities. Although, during the evaluation of strategic synthesis at value chain level, the data analysis demonstrated that not all forms of combination strategies can deliver a high performance. One of the significant findings to emerge from this study is that the value chain framework is essential when analysing forms of successful competitive strategies of UK MSMEs. The results of this investigation also show that generalisations and previous recommendations regarding successful MSMEs competitive strategy should be interpreted with caution.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Report on Analysis of the 260-Day Value at Risk (VAR) of Portfolio of Shares by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Der deutsche Anbietermarkt für Alternativtourismus by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book 'Immer mehr AbiturientInnen nehmen duale Berufsausbildungen an' - Entwicklungen auf dem Arbeitsmarkt by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Versicherung gegen Terrorismus - Das Beispiel des US-amerikanischen Terrorism Risk Insurance Acts 2002 by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Die Pädagogik Hugo Gaudigs by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Onlinebefragung. Ein preiswertes Instrument der empirischen Sozialforschung? by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Intercultural Dictums, Techniques & Terminology by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Soziale Kompensation mit Hinblick auf Chancengerechtigkeit im Vergleich zwischen John Rawls 'Theorie der Gerechtigkeit' und Amartya Sens 'Verwirklichungschancen-Ansatz' by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Drei Beratungsansätze im Vergleich by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Ausgewählte Indikatoren in der technischen Analyse - Darstellung und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Die Zeit-Komponente im Entwicklungs- und Technologiecontrolling by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book A Brief History of the Economic Relations between Vietnam and Japan by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Die Schule zur individuellen Lebensbewältigung by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Ist Online-Beratung eine unterstützende Methodik zur Problemlösung Jugendlicher? by Antonios Michail
Cover of the book Francisco de Goya - Maler der Moderne by Antonios Michail
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy