Morphology's place in the grammar

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Drama, Anthologies
Cover of the book Morphology's place in the grammar by Silvia Alpers, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Silvia Alpers ISBN: 9783638426084
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: October 11, 2005
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: English
Author: Silvia Alpers
ISBN: 9783638426084
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: October 11, 2005
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 2,5, University of Göttingen (Seminar für Englische Philologie), course: Morphology: its relation to syntax, 5 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: There is much discussion in morphological theory as to where exactly morphology belongs in the mental representation of grammar. Several grammar models have been developed, each aiming at describing the key concepts of our grammar and the position of morphology in particular. Traditionally, there seems to have been a general consensus that there exists pre-syntactic (lexical) and post-syntactic components, but recently this has become an issue of debate. A key issue in this discussion is the process of word formation. While some linguists argue that word formation takes place in a separate morphological component, some say syntactic rules also play a part and some argue that words actually are formed in the syntax. Numerous linguists have contributed to this discussion, many proposing new models of morphology and word formation. In this paper, two alternate theories that attempt at describing the position of morphology in the grammar will be outlined. Chapter 2 describes Halle and Marantz' (1993) model of Distributed Morphology, which presupposes that all word formation takes place in a syntactic module and that there is no such thing as a lexical process. Chapters 3 and 4 give an outline of an alternate view to Distributed Morphology. Chapter 3 describes Booij's (1993) approach at proving that there are two different types of inflection, and that contrary to former theories, inflection can feed word formation. In chapter 4, Haspelmath (1995) provides much the same view as Booij by showing that inflection also can contribute to changing a word's part of speech category.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject English Language and Literature Studies - Linguistics, grade: 2,5, University of Göttingen (Seminar für Englische Philologie), course: Morphology: its relation to syntax, 5 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: There is much discussion in morphological theory as to where exactly morphology belongs in the mental representation of grammar. Several grammar models have been developed, each aiming at describing the key concepts of our grammar and the position of morphology in particular. Traditionally, there seems to have been a general consensus that there exists pre-syntactic (lexical) and post-syntactic components, but recently this has become an issue of debate. A key issue in this discussion is the process of word formation. While some linguists argue that word formation takes place in a separate morphological component, some say syntactic rules also play a part and some argue that words actually are formed in the syntax. Numerous linguists have contributed to this discussion, many proposing new models of morphology and word formation. In this paper, two alternate theories that attempt at describing the position of morphology in the grammar will be outlined. Chapter 2 describes Halle and Marantz' (1993) model of Distributed Morphology, which presupposes that all word formation takes place in a syntactic module and that there is no such thing as a lexical process. Chapters 3 and 4 give an outline of an alternate view to Distributed Morphology. Chapter 3 describes Booij's (1993) approach at proving that there are two different types of inflection, and that contrary to former theories, inflection can feed word formation. In chapter 4, Haspelmath (1995) provides much the same view as Booij by showing that inflection also can contribute to changing a word's part of speech category.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book Aufwachsen unter veränderten Vorzeichen. by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Subjektive Theorien und Konzepte des Lernens by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Präsentation und Referate bewerten by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Zwischen Industrialisierung und Globalisierung. Die Entwicklung internationaler ökologischer Nichtregierungsorganisationen (IENGOs) im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Die Einbindung öffentlicher Verkehrsmittel in einen Tourismus ohne Auto by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Die Eisenbahn als strategisches Element bei Helmuth von Moltke in den 'Einigungskriegen' by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Die Entstehung des Warenhauses und ihre Auswirkung auf das öffentliche Leben by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Mountainbike - Erfolgsgarant für den alpinen Sommertourismus? by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Multiperspektivisches Storytelling. Mit Hilfe von multiperspektivischen Geschichten positive Lernräume außerhalb der Schule schaffen by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Die Unabhängigkeit der Zentralbank by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Leonard Nelson by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Neutralität und EU by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Relationship Marketing und persönlicher Verkauf by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Die Geschichte der Interkulturellen Pädagogik by Silvia Alpers
Cover of the book Die Versetzung des vatikanischen Obelisken, Sixtus V. und sein Architekt Domenico Fontana by Silvia Alpers
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy