'The laws of the phenomena of society.' How would Weber and Durkheim have responded to John Stuart Mill's famous quote?

Compare and contrast how Weber and Durkheim might have responded to this statement.

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Education & Teaching
Cover of the book 'The laws of the phenomena of society.' How would Weber and Durkheim have responded to John Stuart Mill's famous quote? by Johannes Lenhard, GRIN Verlag
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Johannes Lenhard ISBN: 9783656323808
Publisher: GRIN Verlag Publication: November 28, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag Language: German
Author: Johannes Lenhard
ISBN: 9783656323808
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
Publication: November 28, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Verlag
Language: German

Essay aus dem Jahr 2012 im Fachbereich Pädagogik - Wissenschaft, Theorie, Anthropologie, Note: 66, University of Cambridge, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: 'The Laws of the phenomena of society are, and can be, nothing but the laws of the actions and passions of human beings . . . Men are not, when brought together, converted into another kind of substance' (John Stuart Mill). Compare and contrast how Weber and Durkheim might have responded to this statement. What John Stuart Mill means seems straightforward: society functions as a unidirectional interplay of individuals. The rules, that govern those individuals in isolation also dominate in situations of collective character. Mill expresses a deep belief in the overarching importance of the individual in comparison to collectives that in turn do not change the actor's behaviour. When we place Mill in his liberal and utilitarian context, this opinion does not surprise; for him, self-interest seemed to rule both the individual and society. To put it crudely: individual > society. Contrasting the 'laws of the phenomena of society' with 'the laws of the actions and passions of human beings', the main difference lies in the society-individual dichotomy, i.e. the level of analysis. The former refers to situations in which more than one actor participates, such as religion, economy or administration. The latter alludes to the personal behaviour, feelings and ideas of a human being, almost to psychology. Without questioning this dichotomy in its foundation , both Weber and Durkheim, differ widely from the view that both spheres of law are approximately congruent. For both scholars, society has a life on its own, rules on its own that are at least partly independent from the individual. Durkheim much more than Weber even ascribes an influence to society that is able to dominate the individual behaviour. For Weber, the overarching force of capitalist society is a particular condition in modern society that he reveals and criticises. The laws of the individual are not without importance in his scheme - but need to be strengthened. Let me introduce his thesis in more detail in the following paragraphs.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay aus dem Jahr 2012 im Fachbereich Pädagogik - Wissenschaft, Theorie, Anthropologie, Note: 66, University of Cambridge, Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: 'The Laws of the phenomena of society are, and can be, nothing but the laws of the actions and passions of human beings . . . Men are not, when brought together, converted into another kind of substance' (John Stuart Mill). Compare and contrast how Weber and Durkheim might have responded to this statement. What John Stuart Mill means seems straightforward: society functions as a unidirectional interplay of individuals. The rules, that govern those individuals in isolation also dominate in situations of collective character. Mill expresses a deep belief in the overarching importance of the individual in comparison to collectives that in turn do not change the actor's behaviour. When we place Mill in his liberal and utilitarian context, this opinion does not surprise; for him, self-interest seemed to rule both the individual and society. To put it crudely: individual > society. Contrasting the 'laws of the phenomena of society' with 'the laws of the actions and passions of human beings', the main difference lies in the society-individual dichotomy, i.e. the level of analysis. The former refers to situations in which more than one actor participates, such as religion, economy or administration. The latter alludes to the personal behaviour, feelings and ideas of a human being, almost to psychology. Without questioning this dichotomy in its foundation , both Weber and Durkheim, differ widely from the view that both spheres of law are approximately congruent. For both scholars, society has a life on its own, rules on its own that are at least partly independent from the individual. Durkheim much more than Weber even ascribes an influence to society that is able to dominate the individual behaviour. For Weber, the overarching force of capitalist society is a particular condition in modern society that he reveals and criticises. The laws of the individual are not without importance in his scheme - but need to be strengthened. Let me introduce his thesis in more detail in the following paragraphs.

More books from GRIN Verlag

Cover of the book 'Was Hänschen nicht lernt, lernt Hans nimmermehr!' Gibt es sensible Phasen in der motorischen Entwicklung? by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Marktchancen für ein Krabat-Musical in der Lausitz by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Konzerninterne Verrechnungspreise in multinationalen Unternehmen am Beispiel der XXX in der Rolle als Tochtergesellschaft by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Gewerkschaften in Lateinamerika by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Gewalt gegen Pflegende. Gewaltprävention und Gewaltintervention in der Pflegebranche by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Belastungen von betrieblichen Interessenvertreterinnen und Interessenvertretern unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Rollenstresskonzeptes by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Gerard David 'Die Verkündigung Mariens' - Werkbeschreibung und Analyse by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Selbstverletzendes Verhalten bei weiblichen Adoleszenten. Interventionsmöglichkeiten in der Sozialen Arbeit by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Das romantische Kunstmärchen als Idealverkörperung der Progressiven Universalpoesie nach Friedrich Schlegel am Beispiel von Ludwig Tiecks Der blonde Eckbert by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Entwicklung, Aufbau und Inhalt des Lehrplans Katholische Religionslehre by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Verschmelzung eines Vereins auf eine GmbH unter Berücksichtigung des Aspektes der Gemeinnützigkeit by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Das Fernsehen des Alexander Kluge by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Urheberrecht in der Musik- und Filmindustrie by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Immigration in Singapore and the USA by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Unterrichtsverfahren im Fach Gemeinschaftskunde: In Gesprächen lernen by Johannes Lenhard
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy